{"id":12052,"date":"2025-06-27T18:30:03","date_gmt":"2025-06-27T13:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jrfadda.com\/exams\/?p=12052"},"modified":"2025-09-20T13:49:02","modified_gmt":"2025-09-20T08:19:02","slug":"ugc-net-kashmiri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jrfadda.com\/exams\/ugc-net\/ugc-net-kashmiri\/","title":{"rendered":"UGC NET Kashmiri 2025, Exam Analysis, Eligibility, Syllabus, Exam Pattern, Career Scope & PYQs"},"content":{"rendered":"

The <\/span>UGC NET Kashmiri 2025<\/b> is a national-level examination conducted by the <\/span>National Testing Agency (NTA)<\/b> on 27th June 2025 on <\/strong>behalf of the <\/span>University Grants Commission (UGC)<\/b>. It provides eligibility for the <\/span>Junior Research Fellowship (JRF)<\/b> and <\/span>Assistant Professor positions<\/b> in universities and colleges across India, specifically for the <\/span>Kashmiri language and literature discipline<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

UGC NET Kashmiri 2025 Exam Analysis<\/b><\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The UGC NET Kashmiri 2025<\/strong> exam, conducted in the June cycle, was rated as moderate<\/strong> in difficulty by most candidates.<\/p>\n

Paper 1<\/strong>, which is common for all subjects, was considered easy to moderate<\/strong>, covering familiar areas like teaching and research aptitude, logical reasoning, data interpretation, ICT, communication, environment, and higher education<\/strong>. Most candidates were able to attempt 38\u201342 questions<\/strong> confidently in this section.<\/p>\n

Paper 2 (Kashmiri)<\/strong> focused on both language and literature<\/strong>, requiring a solid understanding of Kashmiri grammar, history and development of the language, classical and modern poetry, prose, drama, literary criticism<\/strong>, and the works of prominent Kashmiri writers. Some questions tested factual knowledge of literary movements and authors, while others required deeper comprehension and analysis of texts and cultural contexts. A few candidates noted that sections on linguistics and literary theory<\/strong> were slightly challenging due to their conceptual depth.<\/p>\n

Overall, the exam was well-structured and aligned with the syllabus. Candidates with thorough preparation found it manageable. On average, 60\u201365 good attempts<\/strong> were reported in Paper 2. A combined score of 125\u2013135 out of 200<\/strong> is likely to be a safe range for qualifying for Assistant Professor eligibility, while higher marks would be necessary to secure JRF<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n