Mughal – Maratha relations form one of the most decisive political struggles in medieval India. For ugc net aspirants, this topic explains how a regional power led by Shivaji challenged the Mughal Empire and later transformed into a pan-Indian force under the Peshwas. This relationship moved through phases of conflict, negotiation, compromise, renewed warfare, and eventual Mughal decline.
Mughal Maratha Relations Historical Background
In the 17th century, the Mughal Empire expanded southward into the Deccan. At the same time, Shivaji aimed to establish Swaraj in Maharashtra.
The clash between imperial expansion and regional assertion shaped Mughal – Maratha relations, during the reign of Aurangzeb.
Phase I: Shivaji and Mughals

Early Conflicts
Shivaji began by capturing forts from the Bijapur Sultanate. Mughal interest in the Deccan soon led to confrontation.
Important events:
- Attack on Shaista Khan (1663)
- Raid on Surat (1664)
- Treaty of Purandar (1665)
The Treaty of Purandar temporarily settled Mughal – Maratha relations, but distrust continued.
Shivaji’s Visit to Agra
In 1666, Shivaji visited Aurangzeb’s court. Mughal authorities detained him. Shivaji escaped dramatically.
This event damaged trust in Mughal – Maratha relations, and conflict resumed.
Phase II: War Under Aurangzeb
Shivaji’s death in 1680, Aurangzeb personally moved to the Deccan to suppress the rising Maratha power and bring the region under firm Mughal control. He directed prolonged military campaigns against Maratha forts, leaders, and territories with the aim of ending their resistance. These wars continued for decades, draining Mughal resources while the Marathas used guerrilla tactics to sustain their struggle
Major Developments
- Execution of Sambhaji (1689)
- Resistance under Rajaram
- Guerrilla warfare
- Mughal occupation of forts
Aurangzeb spent 27 years in the Deccan. Continuous warfare drained Mughal resources. Mughal – Maratha relations, during this phase shifted from negotiation to total war.
Mughal – Maratha relations, During Shivaji Period
Relations between Shivaji and the Mughal Empire were mostly hostile, as he challenged imperial authority through military raids and territorial expansion.
Under Aurangzeb, conflicts intensified despite brief truces like the Treaty of Purandar, showing a continuous power struggle in the Deccan.
| Event | Year | Impact |
| Surat Raid | 1664 | Demonstrated Maratha strength |
| Treaty of Purandar | 1665 | Temporary compromise |
| Agra Incident | 1666 | Breakdown of trust |
| Coronation | 1674 | Assertion of sovereignty |
Phase III: Post-Aurangzeb Settlement
After Aurangzeb died in 1707, the Mughal Empire weakened due to succession struggles and administrative strain. His successors adopted conciliatory policies, recognizing Shahu and granting rights like chauth and sardeshmukhi to secure Maratha cooperation. This settlement marked a shift from constant warfare to negotiation and political partnership.
Shahu’s Release
- Mughals released Shahu, Shivaji’s grandson, hoping to divide Marathas.
- This marked a diplomatic shift in Mughal – Maratha relations, where negotiation replaced full-scale war.
Phase IV: Rise of the Peshwas
The rise of the Peshwas marked a major shift in the power structure of the Maratha state, where real authority gradually passed from the Chhatrapati to the prime ministers. Under Balaji Vishwanath, the office became hereditary and politically influential, while Baji Rao I expanded Maratha dominance across much of India through military campaigns and diplomacy. By the mid-18th century, the Peshwas had transformed the Marathas into the leading power in Indian politics.
Under Peshwa Baji Rao I:
- Marathas entered North India
- Defeated Mughal governors
- Influenced Delhi politics
Mughal – Maratha relations, transformed from defensive conflict to Maratha dominance.
Expansion Policy
The Marathas collected Chauth (25%) and Sardeshmukhi (10%) from territories under their influence, strengthening state finances.
- They expanded aggressively into Malwa, Gujarat, Bundelkhand, and northern India, using both military campaigns and strategic alliances to assert dominance over regional rulers. This policy turned the Marathas into a major political and military power in 18th-century India.
- They exercised power in Malwa, Gujarat, and Bundelkhand.
- The Mughal emperor became increasingly dependent on Maratha support.
Changing Nature of Mughal – Maratha relations
The Mughal–Maratha relations changed from early conflict to uneasy negotiation over time. During Shivaji’s rise, they fought frequent wars in the Deccan, but after Aurangzeb’s death, both sides opted for treaties, tribute arrangements, and political alliances, reflecting a shift from direct warfare to diplomacy and influence.
| Phase | Nature of Relation | Result |
| Shivaji Era | Conflict + treaty | Limited compromise |
| Aurangzeb Era | Prolonged war | Mughal exhaustion |
| Early 18th Century | Negotiation | Maratha recognition |
| Peshwa Era | Maratha dominance | Mughal decline |
Mughal – Maratha relations Military Comparison
The Mughal military relied on heavy cavalry, large infantry, and artillery under a centralized command, emphasizing formal battlefield engagements. In contrast, the Marathas used light cavalry, guerrilla tactics, and rapid mobility, leveraging hill forts and hit-and-run strategies to outmaneuver larger armies.
Mughal Military
- Heavy cavalry
- Large infantry
- Artillery
- Central command
Maratha Military
- Light cavalry
- Guerrilla tactics
- Rapid mobility
- Fort-based strategy
The contrast shaped Mughal – Maratha relations, across decades.
Mughal – Maratha relations Administrative Contrast
| Aspect | Mughals | Marathas |
| Revenue | Zabt system | Chauth, Sardeshmukhi |
| Governance | Mansabdari | Ashtapradhan |
| Control | Centralized | Confederacy model |
Sources for Mughal – Maratha relations
The Mughal–Maratha relations evolved from early conflicts during Shivaji’s rise to complex political negotiations under Aurangzeb, shaping the power dynamics of 17th and 18th century India.”
- Jadunath Sarkar, Shivaji and His Times – Classic work covering Shivaji’s campaigns and early Mughal conflicts.
- Jadunath Sarkar, Fall of the Mughal Empire – Details Maratha expansion under the Peshwas and late Mughal decline.
- R.S. Chaurasia, History of Medieval India – Provides concise accounts of Mughal–Maratha wars.
- Irfan Habib, The Agrarian System of Mughal India – Contextualizes Mughal-Maratha interactions in terms of politics and economy.
- Satish Chandra, Medieval India – Comprehensive coverage of Deccan politics and Mughal-Maratha relations.
Primary Sources:
- Ain-i-Akbari by Abul Fazl (for Mughal administrative perspective)
- Bakhar texts (Maratha chronicles detailing Shivaji’s campaigns)
Persian Sources
- Maasir-i-Alamgiri
- Alamgirnama
Marathi Sources
- Sabhasad Bakhar
- Chitnis Bakhar
European Accounts
- French and English factory records
- Traveler narratives
These sources offer different perspectives on Mughal – Maratha relations, including bias and interpretation.
Best UGC NET Offline Classes in Jaipur
Mughal – Maratha relations Economic Impact
Continuous wars:
- Increased taxation
- Destroyed agriculture
- Weakened Mughal treasury
- Strengthened Maratha revenue network
Economic strain weakened Mughal control.
Mughal – Maratha relations Political Consequences
- Mughal decline accelerated
- Marathas emerged as dominant Indian power
- Regional autonomy increased
- British gained opportunity
The transformation in Mughal – Maratha relations, changed India’s political balance.
Third Battle of Panipat (1761)
Marathas fought Ahmad Shah Abdali.
Though not directly a Mughal conflict, the weakened Mughal authority created the context.
After Panipat, Marathas recovered but Mughal authority remained symbolic.
Causes of Mughal Weakness in Conflict
- Overextension in Deccan
- Guerrilla warfare challenges
- Financial drain
- Lack of local support
These factors influenced Mughal – Maratha relations, by shifting power gradually.
Long-Term Historical Significance
Mughal – Maratha relations, represent:
- Transition from imperial centralization
- Rise of regional power
- Beginning of Mughal fragmentation
- Precondition for colonial expansion
Top UGC NET Coaching in Jaipur
Mughal – Maratha relations began as a regional rebellion under Shivaji and evolved into a long political struggle that weakened the Mughal Empire. Aurangzeb’s prolonged Deccan campaigns drained imperial strength. After 1707, diplomacy and negotiation replaced direct conflict. Under the Peshwas, Marathas became dominant in northern India.
In conclusion, Mughal – Maratha relations illustrate how sustained regional resistance transformed the subcontinent’s political structure.
Mughal – Maratha Relations FAQs
What were Mughal–Maratha relations during Shivaji’s time?
During Shivaji’s period, Mughal–Maratha relations were marked by frequent raids, skirmishes, and battles. Shivaji challenged Mughal authority in the Deccan, capturing forts and territory. Despite occasional treaties like Purandar, mutual mistrust and hostility persisted.
Why did Aurangzeb personally lead Deccan campaigns?
Aurangzeb led the Deccan campaigns to suppress the growing Maratha power. He aimed to consolidate Mughal authority over southern India. His direct involvement reflected the seriousness of the Maratha challenge to the empire.
What was the Treaty of Purandar?
The Treaty of Purandar in 1665 required Shivaji to surrender 23 forts to the Mughals. In return, he received a formal position under the Mughal administration. The treaty was temporary and did not end Maratha resistance.
How did Peshwas change Mughal–Maratha relations?
Under the Peshwas, the Marathas shifted from defensive strategies to aggressive northern expansion. They challenged Mughal dominance politically and militarily. Tribute collection and confederacy alliances strengthened Maratha influence over former Mughal territories.
Which sources describe this conflict?
Persian chronicles, such as the Maasir-i-Alamgiri, provide Mughal perspectives on the Deccan wars. Marathi Bakhars record Maratha strategies and heroism. European travel accounts offer external observations of the campaigns and regional politics.



